Consumer Evidence
The hotel doesn't even provide shampoo, breakfast is extra and limited, food is poorly made, parking is extra, no meals available, tiny rooms, TV doesn't work, elevator issues, and lots of train noise. For the price paid, it fell short—other places offer more for the same price. I don't recommend it.
Interpretation: This comment demonstrates how multiple service gaps compound to create a strong sense of price unfairness. The consumer's dissatisfaction is not just about individual issues, but about the overall value failing to meet the price paid, reinforcing the importance of aligning experience with price.
Very expensive for little value. We waited 40 minutes for our dish, and when it finally arrived it looked dried out and was almost cold. Since we were late for another appointment, we ate and left. This is the first and last time at this place.
Interpretation: Here, slow and poor service directly undermines the perceived value, making the price seem unjustifiable. The consumer's decision not to return highlights how negative price perception can drive customer attrition.
This time I was disappointed beyond belief because the parking fees were astronomical ($75 for 2 nights). I'm a [Company] Rewards Member and an AARP Member but received no discounts. The room was dirty and the AC didn't work properly. I would not recommend this place ever again.
Interpretation: The mismatch between expected perks, cleanliness, and high ancillary costs leads the consumer to feel their loyalty is unrecognized and their payment disrespected, illustrating how price perception is shaped by both tangible and intangible factors.
DO NOT EAT HERE. Missing order items. Managers don't care and lie. Waited for cold food. The burgers are ridiculously small now.
Interpretation: Service failures and reduced portion sizes intensify the sense of being shortchanged, showing how operational lapses directly translate into negative price perception and eroded trust.
Disappointing. We went to celebrate our anniversary. Our meal took 1 hour and 40 minutes to arrive, the fish was lukewarm, the parmegiana tasteless. No apology from staff. We paid 715.00 and the food and service weren't worth half that. We won't return.
Interpretation: This comment reveals how special occasions heighten expectations, and when the experience fails, the perceived value drops sharply, making the price feel especially unjustified and damaging loyalty.
Being a long-time customer, I always leave feeling it's not worth the price. On my last stay, the children's pool was cold, food portions were tiny, and the room was in poor condition. For R$1,500 a night, you get a two-star experience. I think it's worth a third of what they charge.
Interpretation: Repeated disappointment and a clear mismatch between price and quality lead the consumer to question the brand's respect for their patronage, illustrating the fragility of price perception over time.
My experience today at [Company] was terrible. The system was down for 40 minutes. Prices at checkout were higher than on the shelf for several products. This is absurd. Many people gave up. This will be my last time shopping at this store.
Interpretation: Discrepancies between advertised and charged prices break trust and make consumers feel exploited, showing how even operational errors can have lasting effects on price perception and loyalty.
No shuttle to airport, no breakfast, and not even a microwave in the room. [Company] would have been a better and cheaper option.
Interpretation: The absence of expected amenities causes the consumer to compare unfavorably with cheaper alternatives, highlighting how unmet expectations drive negative price perception.
Consumer comments shown on this page may have been translated, abbreviated, anonymized, or generalized to remove personal names, company names, product names, locations, contact information, and other identifying details while preserving their original meaning.